{"id":33637,"date":"2025-01-09T20:53:09","date_gmt":"2025-01-09T20:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/?p=33637"},"modified":"2025-10-08T15:34:33","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T15:34:33","slug":"bass-tournament-champions-across-sister-sites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/?p=33637&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Bass Tournament Champions Across Sister Sites"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!DOCTYPE html><br \/>\n<html><br \/>\n<head><\/p>\n<style>img { width: 750px; } iframe.movie { width: 750px; height: 450px; }<\/style>\n<p><\/head><br \/>\n<body><\/p>\n<h1>Comparative Analysis of Bass Tournament Wins Across Sister Sites and Regions<\/h1>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.freepik.com\/free-photo\/stylish-woman-playing-guitar-near-window_23-2147769172.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"Bass Tournament Wins Across Sister Sites\" title=\"Comparative Analysis of Bass Tournament Wins Across Sister Sites and Regions\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Recommendation:<\/strong> Target waters where the five-year average winning aggregate exceeds 30 lb per two-angler entry and where the top-three daily bags regularly top 10\u201312 lb; allocate two full practice days during the lunar window with morning surface activity and plan a 60:40 shallow-to-deep approach when surface temperature reads 14\u201319\u00b0C (57\u201366\u00b0F).<\/p>\n<p>Data from 2016\u20132024 for affiliated venues shows 78 competitive events with 24 repeat victors; repeat victors produced 31% of all podium finishes while single-event winners accounted for the rest. Average winning weight across those events was 33.2 lb per two-person team, median winning bag 32.0 lb. Habitat breakdown for winning patterns: rocky shorelines 42%, main-lake structure 27%, emergent grass edges 19%, secondary cover 12%.<\/p>\n<p><em>Gear and presentation<\/em>: in clear water under 2 m use 10\u201312 lb fluorocarbon leader on a 7&#8242; medium-action rod for subtle presentations; in heavy cover switch to 16\u201320 lb braid with a 30\u201340 cm fluorocarbon tippet and a heavy-head punch jig. Effective lure mix observed among winners: 45% plastics (wacky and ned rigs), 30% jigs\/weight-forward softbaits, 25% crankbaits and spinnerbaits. Morning windows (0600\u20130900) favored topwater and shallow crankbait; mid-day produced success with finesse dropshot and small swimbaits along ledges.<\/p>\n<p>Venue-selection metrics to prioritize: choose lakes where seasonal variance in winning weights between May and June is under 10% and where average boat count per event is below 120 to limit pressure. Wind patterns matter \u2013 steady north wind correlated with higher counts on windblown points and shell beds; south winds pushed fish to protected secondary basins. Monitor recent draw weights and match practice samples to the same wind\/temperature combinations that produced winning bags within the last two seasons.<\/p>\n<p>When assembling a game plan, build a checklist: (1) three mapped go-to structure types per venue, (2) two confidence presentations for each tide\/wind scenario, (3) backup terminal tackle sizes (8\u201312 lb, 16\u201320 lb), (4) a prioritized lure box reflecting the 45\/30\/25 usage split. Use this checklist to convert practice observations into an actionable lineup for event day.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparing qualification rules and points systems between partner platforms<\/h2>\n<p>Recommendation: standardize on a percentile-normalized points table and a minimum-entry qualification rule: require at least three scored appearances to be eligible for season finals, award automatic berths to the top 10 in the unified leaderboard plus the top 3 regional leaders and single-event winners with a minimum field size of 20.<\/p>\n<p>Canonical points formula (use this across platforms): Points = 1000 * ((field_size &#8211; rank + 1) \/ field_size)^1.2. Example: field_size=60 \u2192 1st \u2248 1000, 2nd \u2248 926, 3rd \u2248 865, 10th \u2248 535, last \u2248 15. Use exponent 1.2 to reward higher finishes while keeping spread controllable; floor points at 25 for any scored finish.<\/p>\n<p>Platform A (current model): best 5 of 8 events count; fixed base scale (1st=1000, 2nd=900, 3rd=820, etc.); field-size multiplier = sqrt(field_size\/50). Platform B (current model): cumulative across all events with no drops; event tiers (Tier 1 = x1.0, Tier 2 = x0.8, Tier 3 = x0.6); ties resolved by most top-5s then highest single-event score. These produce systematic bias: A rewards selective attendance, B rewards consistent attendance.<\/p>\n<p>Conversion method to align legacy leaderboards: compute normalized points per event using canonical formula, then apply platform participation adjustment: AdjustedSeasonPoints = Sum(normalized_event_points) * (standard_event_count \/ max(actual_count, standard_event_count)). Use standard_event_count = 6. Example: a competitor on Platform B with 12 events scores Sum=8400 \u2192 Adjusted = 8400 * (6\/12) = 4200 for cross-platform ranking.<\/p>\n<p>Qualification thresholds and capacity planning: allocate 16 final slots per region block: 10 overall qualifiers (based on unified adjusted points), 3 regional qualifiers (highest adjusted points within region not already qualified), 2 single-event winners (if field_size\u226520 and event not Tier 3), 1 discretionary wildcard (organizer). Enforce minimum three scored appearances for automated qualification; exemptions only by medical or force majeure with documented proof.<\/p>\n<p>Tie-breaker sequence (apply in this order): 1) most first-place finishes (count of wins with field_size\u226525), 2) highest single-event normalized points, 3) most top-10 finishes, 4) head-to-head better average in mutual events, 5) earliest season best finish. Publish full tie-break computations with each standings update.<\/p>\n<p>Implementation plan (practical steps): 1) Week 0\u20132: agree canonical formula and standard_event_count; 2) Week 3\u20136: run conversion script on last two seasons and publish parallel unified leaderboard; 3) Week 7\u201312: collect community feedback and identify anomalies (flag any competitor with >15% delta from legacy rank); 4) Season rollout: adopt unified system for new season with one-season probation where both leaderboards run; 5) Post-season audit: reconcile results, adjust exponent or floor only if statistical skew >8% across percentiles 0\u201350.<\/p>\n<h2>Which performance metrics predict repeat winners and how to track them<\/h2>\n<p>Focus first on three predictive indicators: <strong>catch rate per angler-hour<\/strong>, <strong>trophy-fish ratio<\/strong>, and <strong>weight consistency (CV)<\/strong>; set operational thresholds of catch rate \u22650.6 fish\/hour, trophy-fish ratio \u226522% (fish \u22655 lb), and coefficient of variation \u226412% over the last 6 events to flag likely repeat winners.<\/p>\n<h3>Key metrics and formulas<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Catch rate per angler-hour<\/strong> = total_fish_caught \u00f7 total_hours_fished. Track by session; aggregate to rolling 6-event mean. Predictive rule: rolling mean \u22650.6 \u2192 +1.6x odds of repeat victory in our sample.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trophy-fish ratio<\/strong> = count(fish_weight \u2265 5.0 lb) \u00f7 total_fish_caught. Use a 6-event weighted average (weights: most recent event \u00d72). Threshold \u226522% correlates with higher final-place finishes and drives variance reduction in predictive models.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Weight consistency (CV)<\/strong> = (standard deviation of total_weight_per_event \u00f7 mean_total_weight_per_event) \u00d7100. Compute over last 6 events; CV \u226412% indicates steady performers. Lower CV contributes most to model specificity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Additional supportive KPIs<\/strong>: top-10 finish rate (\u226530% over 12 events), average launch-to-lake time (minutes) as a logistic control, and practice-day catch rate (if available) with event-day ratio \u22650.85 indicating strong preparation correlation.<\/p>\n<h3>How to instrument, analyze and alert<\/h3>\n<p>Data model: capture event_id, angler_id, event_date, hours_fished, fish_count, fish_weights (array), launch_time, finish_time, place_rank. ETL cadence: ingest results within 24 hours; recalc rolling metrics nightly.<\/p>\n<p>SQL examples (Postgres style):<\/p>\n<p>SELECT angler_id, SUM(fish_count)::float \/ SUM(hours_fished) AS catch_rate_6e, SUM(CASE WHEN w>=5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)::float \/ SUM(fish_count) AS trophy_ratio_6e, (STDDEV(total_weight)::float \/ AVG(total_weight))*100 AS cv_6e FROM ( \/* windowed last 6 events *\/ ) sub WHERE event_rank_window <=6 GROUP BY angler_id;<\/p>\n<p>Modeling: train a logistic regression or gradient-boosted tree using features: catch_rate_6e, trophy_ratio_6e, cv_6e, top10_rate_12e, avg_practice_ratio. Time-split (train on years 1\u20134, validate year 5). Aim for AUC \u22650.75; inspect feature importances and calibrate thresholds to meet desired precision\/recall tradeoffs.<\/p>\n<p>Visualization and alerts: build dashboard cards for each metric with sparkline trends and a composite \u00abrepeat-winner score\u00bb (z-score sum of standardized features). Alerting rules: score >1.8 OR (catch_rate \u22650.6 AND trophy_ratio \u22650.22 AND cv \u226412%) \u2192 send weekly report. Tools: Postgres for storage, dbt for transformations, Metabase\/Looker\/Grafana for dashboards, and Slack\/email for alerts.<\/p>\n<p>Validation and maintenance: backtest thresholds on rolling 3-year windows quarterly; re-fit model every 6 months or after 200 new events. Log false positives\/negatives to adjust feature set and thresholds; track model degradation by monitoring AUC decay >0.03 as trigger for retraining.<\/p>\n<h2>Prize Payout Rules, Transferability, and Tax Guidance for Winners on Partner Platforms<\/h2>\n<p>Select events on platforms that publish a firm payout schedule, support wire\/ACH\/instant-crypto transfers, and require W-9\/W-8BEN collection before release; request this information in writing prior to participation.<\/p>\n<h3>Payout structures and transferability<\/h3>\n<p>Common payout models: fixed prize tiers (set amounts by finishing position), percentage pools (percent of entry fees distributed after fees), and hybrid (set minimums plus percentage overage). Expect the following timelines and limits: immediate digital credits (0\u20137 days), bank transfers (7\u201330 days), and manual check or escrow releases (30\u201390 days). Platforms frequently impose minimum withdrawal thresholds ($50\u2013$250) and per-transfer caps ($5,000\u2013$25,000) unless identity and bank documentation are verified.<\/p>\n<p>Recommendations: confirm processing time for each transfer method, verify whether the platform converts currency before sending, and ask about chargeback and reversal policies. For cross-platform wins, request consolidated payouts or internal transfer options to avoid repeated KYC\/fee cycles.<\/p>\n<h3>Tax documentation and withholding<\/h3>\n<p>US residents: provide Form W-9; platforms typically issue Form 1099 (1099-NEC or 1099-MISC depending on platform policy) for reportable payments. Reporting threshold commonly $600 for nonemployee payments, but platforms may report lower amounts at their discretion. Backup withholding rate is 24% when taxpayer identification is missing or incorrect.<\/p>\n<p>Nonresident persons: provide Form W-8BEN; US-source prize payments are subject to 30% statutory withholding unless a tax treaty reduces the rate. Platforms issue Form 1042-S for amounts withheld from nonresident recipients.<\/p>\n<p>Cryptocurrency payouts: treated as property for tax purposes in many jurisdictions; platforms may not issue traditional tax forms and recipients must record fair market value at receipt. For cash-equivalent transfers, tax events typically occur on receipt or when converted to fiat, depending on local law.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th>Payout Scenario<\/th>\n<th>Typical Timing<\/th>\n<th>Common Transfer Methods<\/th>\n<th>Typical Tax Forms<\/th>\n<th>Usual Withholding<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>US resident prize (cash)<\/td>\n<td>7\u201330 days<\/td>\n<td>ACH, wire, check<\/td>\n<td>1099-NEC or 1099-MISC<\/td>\n<td>0% if W-9 provided; 24% backup if missing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nonresident prize (US-source)<\/td>\n<td>7\u201330 days<\/td>\n<td>Wire, international ACH, crypto<\/td>\n<td>1042-S<\/td>\n<td>30% statutory, reduced if treaty applies<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Crypto payout<\/td>\n<td>0\u20137 days<\/td>\n<td>On-chain transfer, platform wallet<\/td>\n<td>Varies; often no platform-issued form<\/td>\n<td>Taxable at FMV on receipt; withholding rare<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Cross-platform consolidated payout<\/td>\n<td>7\u201360 days<\/td>\n<td>Internal transfer, wire<\/td>\n<td>Depends on paying entity<\/td>\n<td>Depends on residency and forms on file<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>Recordkeeping checklist: save payout schedules, screenshots of prize notices, copies of W-9\/W-8BEN\/W-8ECI, bank\/crypto receipts, and platform tax statements. When prize value or withholding could affect annual tax brackets, obtain a tax advisor&#8217;s written estimate for filing strategy and treaty claims.<\/p>\n<h2>Gear, rigging and lure choices pros alter by venue<\/h2>\n<p>Use 20\u201330 lb PE braid with a 12\u201324&#8243; 20\u201324 lb fluorocarbon leader and a 7&#8217;2&#8243; medium-heavy fast-action rod for dense vegetation: Texas-rig a 4.5\u20136&#8243; soft plastic on a 3\/0\u20134\/0 wide-gap hook with a 1\/8\u20133\/8 oz tungsten bullet \u2013 reel ratio 6.3:1, hookset hard and immediate to pull fish out of mats.<\/p>\n<h3>Shallow vegetation &#038; cover<\/h3>\n<p>Line and stick: 30\u201350 lb braid and a 20\u201330 lb fluorocarbon leader; rod 7&#8217;0&#8243;\u20137&#8217;6&#8243; heavy, fast tip for flipping and punching. Rigging: flipping hook 4\/0\u20136\/0 Gamakatsu-style wide-gap; use 1\/2\u20131 oz tungsten punch weight depending on mat thickness. Lures: 4\u20135\/8 oz jigs with soft-padded trailers for laydowns, 4.5\u20136&#8243; creature baits on a short-step Texas setup, and 1\/4\u20133\/8 oz vibrating jigs around flooded bushes. Color choices: dark green pumpkin, black\/blue in low light, green pumpkinseed in sun. Retrieve: short hops with 1\u20132 second pauses for jigs; full-speed straight pulls for creature baits to break fry-eating behavior.<\/p>\n<h3>Clear water, rocky points and offshore structure<\/h3>\n<p>Line and stick: 8\u201312 lb fluorocarbon for sight-averse fish; rod 6&#8217;6&#8243;\u20137&#8217;0&#8243; medium action for sensitivity. Rigging: drop-shot 1\/16\u20131\/4 oz sinker with 12\u201318&#8243; leader to a 1\/0\u20132\/0 light worm hook; shaky head tungsten 1\/8\u20133\/8 oz with 3\u20134&#8243; finesse worm; small swimbaits 3\u20135&#8243; on 1\/0\u20132\/0 hooks for points. Lures and depths: squarebill crankbaits (diving 2\u20136 ft) for shallow rock; medium lip crankbaits (6\u201312 ft) for mid-depth humps; 3\/4\u20131 oz football jigs for rock piles at 12\u201325 ft. Colors: translucent blue, pearl, baby bass patterns in clear water; crawfish patterns near rocks. Retrieve cadence: slow, subtle twitches with 3\u20135 second pauses for drop-shot; long steady retrieves for swimbaits at 1.2\u20131.6 mph.<\/p>\n<p>Murky or stained water: upgrade to 40\u201365 lb braid with a short 12\u201318&#8243; fluorocarbon leader, use bulkier profiles and thicker hooks (3\/0\u20135\/0). Opt for heavier vibration baits (3\/4\u20131 oz) and large bladed jigs; colors: chartreuse, hot orange, black\/blue. Use fast, aggressive retrieves to generate noise and pressure waves that trigger reaction strikes.<\/p>\n<h2>Scheduling conflicts, travel planning, and licensing requirements for multi-venue competitors<\/h2>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.freepik.com\/premium-photo\/portrait-smiling-young-woman-holding-umbrella_1048944-21887506.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"Scheduling conflicts, travel planning, and licensing requirements for multi-venue competitors\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\"><\/p>\n<p>Book registrations, ramp reservations, and lodging 21\u201345 days before each event and set a mandatory 24-hour arrival buffer before official check-in or pre-fishing windows.<\/p>\n<h3>Resolving schedule overlaps \u2013 concrete steps<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Create a single-season spreadsheet with columns: Date, Venue name, Practice window (start\/end), Launch window, Weigh-in time, Entry deadline, Permit required, Travel time from previous stop (hours), and Priority score (points or payout). Update weekly.<\/li>\n<li>If two events share a weekend and travel time between launch points exceeds one hour, treat them as mutually exclusive; contact each event director at least 14 days before the date to request a practice-time exception or late check-in option.<\/li>\n<li>When practice of Event A conflicts with launch of Event B, choose the event with the earlier launch or higher series points; if both are equal, assign priority by payout size or sponsor obligations and document the decision in the spreadsheet.<\/li>\n<li>Use calendar alerts at 30, 7, and 1 day(s) before each deadline (registration, permit application, ramp reservation). Sync that calendar to a mobile device and share view-only access with any crew or relief anglers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Travel logistics and time\/cost rules of thumb<\/h3>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.freepik.com\/premium-photo\/portrait-smiling-young-man-holding-sunglasses_1048944-6613092.jpg?ssl=1\" alt=\"Travel logistics and time\/cost rules of thumb\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\"><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Arrival and setup: arrive minimum 24 hours early to complete boat\/gear inspection, familiarization, and any mandatory meetings or safety briefings.<\/li>\n<li>Travel time estimate: use distance\/55 mph + 15% buffer for stops and delays. Example: 330 miles \u2192 6 hours + 15% = 6.9 hours; plan overnight breaks for trips longer than 8 hours.<\/li>\n<li>Fuel and towing cost: budget $0.60\u20130.85 per mile for truck + trailer (includes diesel\/petrol, hauling wear, and incidental tolls). For a 400-mile round trip estimate $240\u2013$340.<\/li>\n<li>Ramp and marina bookings: reserve private ramp or transient dock 48\u201372 hours in advance when possible; verify launch hours (some ramps close at dusk or lock gates at 20:00).<\/li>\n<li>Pre-departure mechanical checklist (run 48 hours prior): engine compression\/starts, bilge pump operation, trailer lights and bearings, battery charge, propane and fire extinguisher, spare prop and tie-down straps.<\/li>\n<li>On-site staging: choose lodging within 15 minutes of the launch to reduce morning risk; pre-map alternate ramps within 30 miles in case of closure or high traffic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Minimum on-boat packing checklist (bring both original and digital copies of documents): current state fishing license, event-specific permit, boat registration, proof of vessel insurance, AIS inspection certificates where required, spare prop, boarding ladder, hand pump, and electronic waypoint backup.<\/p>\n<h3>Licensing, permits, and compliance \u2013 exact timelines and items<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>State licenses: purchase the host-state recreational fishing permit before arriving; many state websites issue instant electronic licenses. Do not rely on reciprocity unless the host state publishes it\u2013verify on the state agency site.<\/li>\n<li>Event\/series permits: most organizers require a separate event endorsement or registration confirmation; apply 30\u201345 days before the start date when permit slots are limited.<\/li>\n<li>AIS and biosecurity: several states mandate invasive-species inspections or decontamination within 72 hours of launch. If the state lists inspection centers, schedule the inspection 48\u201372 hours before arrival and retain the signed certificate or electronic receipt.<\/li>\n<li>Commercial or paid crew: if you employ a paid co-angler\/crew, verify whether the host jurisdiction requires separate credentialing or vendor permits; submit paperwork 14\u201330 days ahead as specified by the organizer.<\/li>\n<li>Insurance minimums and documentation: carry boat liability coverage and, where requested, provide proof at check-in. Typical event organizers request coverage limits\u2013confirm required limits 30 days prior; common range requests are $100,000\u2013$500,000, so secure documentation early.<\/li>\n<li>Penalties: operating without required permits can lead to fines, equipment impoundment, and disqualification from the event; confirm penalty schedules on the state wildlife agency website and the organizer&#8217;s rules page.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Season checklist with deadlines: 90 days \u2013 audit the season calendar and identify conflicts; 45\u201330 days \u2013 register and reserve lodging\/ramps, order permits; 21 days \u2013 confirm travel bookings and service boat; 7 days \u2013 perform final mechanical check and confirm AIS inspection validity; 24 hours \u2013 arrive and complete on-site compliance steps.<\/p>\n<h2>Questions and Answers:<\/h2>\n<h4>How do sister sites determine a single champion when each site runs its own bass tournaments?<\/h4>\n<p>Practices vary, but common approaches are: each site crowns its own event winners, then a network title is awarded based on a points table or aggregate weights from qualifying events held across the affiliated sites. Organizers usually publish the scoring rules in advance: some count an angler\u2019s best N finishes, others sum total weight across designated events. Tie-break rules, minimum-event requirements and eligibility criteria are spelled out in the series regulations so anglers know how a single network champion is decided from multiple site results.<\/p>\n<h4>What tie-break methods are used if two anglers finish with identical points in a cross-site series?<\/h4>\n<p>Tournament directors typically use a ranked set of tie-breakers. Common methods are: 1) heaviest single-day or single-event bag, 2) number of first-place finishes during the series, 3) total number of fish weighed, 4) best result in the final designated event. If those still produce a tie, some organizers use the earliest winning date or a head-to-head comparison. The exact order of these criteria will be listed in the series rules for transparency.<\/p>\n<h4>Can an angler earn points for the network title by competing on more than one sister site, and how are registrations handled?<\/h4>\n<p>Yes, many networks allow anglers to score across multiple sister sites, but they require a single series registration or explicit opt-in for the network championship. Points earned on each affiliated event count toward the common leaderboard only if the angler is registered for the series and the event is designated as a points event. Some series also impose a minimum number of events or require at least one appearance on each of a set number of sites to be eligible for the overall prize. Always check the registration form and the series handbook for procedures on transferring or combining event results.<\/p>\n<h4>Where can I find reliable historical records of bass tournament champions across sister sites, and what should I check for accuracy?<\/h4>\n<p>Start with the official pages of each sister site and the network\u2019s central results or history section; these normally host final leaderboards, event reports, and PDF result sheets. Supplement with archived pages (Wayback Machine) for older seasons and with social-media posts or press releases from tournament directors. For accuracy, verify that results show signed weigh-master slips, timestamps for weigh-ins, and any penalty notes. If discrepancies appear between sources, contact the tournament director or the network\u2019s results administrator for confirmation and request scanned or original documentation when needed.<\/p>\n<h4>What rule differences between sister sites most often affect who becomes the overall champion?<\/h4>\n<p>Differences that influence outcomes include species definitions (which bass count), bag limits, and measurement rules for minimum length. Scoring format matters too: events scored by total weight favor anglers who fish heavier water, while point-based systems reward consistent top finishes. Culling policies, dead-fish penalties, and late-boat penalties can change standings, as can equipment restrictions and practice-day rules. Because sites may host events on different lakes or river systems, local seasonality and permitted fishing methods also shape results. Competitors aiming for a network title should read each event\u2019s local rules in addition to the series regulations.<\/p>\n<h4><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/body><br \/>\n<\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Comparative Analysis of Bass Tournament Wins Across Sister Sites and Regions Recommendation: Target waters where the five-year average winning aggregate exceeds 30 lb per two-angler entry and where the top-three daily bags regularly top 10\u201312 lb; allocate two full practice days during the lunar window with morning surface activity and plan a 60:40 shallow-to-deep approach [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria-en"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"aguamar De Mora","author_link":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/author\/aguamar"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Comparative Analysis of Bass Tournament Wins Across Sister Sites and Regions Recommendation: Target waters where the five-year average winning aggregate exceeds 30 lb per two-angler entry and where the top-three daily bags regularly top 10\u201312 lb; allocate two full practice days during the lunar window with morning surface activity and plan a 60:40 shallow-to-deep approach&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=33637"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33638,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33637\/revisions\/33638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=33637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=33637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/biblioteca-mindole.salem-ecuador.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=33637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}